Skip to main content

Anger Thought Challenging Record

Evaluating and disputing thoughts is a fundamental skill taught by cognitive therapists to their clients. The Anger Thought Challenging Record can help clients think more accurately, practice the process of questioning their thoughts, and address unhelpful biases in their thinking. 

Clients are encouraged to record specific instances in which angry thoughts, feelings, or responses were triggered, including details of their emotional reactions and any associated body sensations. Training clients to record specific details is often helpful when later elaborating a memory for an event, or simply in understanding the reasons for subsequent thoughts and responses. Clients are also instructed to generate alternate ways of interpreting these experiences.

Download or send

Choose your language

Professional version

A PDF of the resource, theoretical background, suggested therapist questions and prompts.

Client version

A PDF of the resource plus client-friendly instructions where appropriate.

Fillable version (PDF)

A fillable version of the resource. This can be edited and saved in Adobe Acrobat, or other PDF editing software.

Editable version (PPT)

An editable Microsoft PowerPoint version of the resource.

Translation Template

Are you a qualified therapist who would like to help with our translation project?

Tags

Languages this resource is available in

  • Arabic
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • English (GB)
  • English (US)
  • French
  • German
  • Greek
  • Hindi
  • Italian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese (European)
  • Serbian
  • Sinhala
  • Spanish (International)
  • Vietnamese

Problems this resource might be used to address

Techniques associated with this resource

Mechanisms associated with this resource

Introduction & Theoretical Background

This Anger Thought Challenging Record is designed to help clients to challenge their angry thoughts. Clients are encouraged to record their angry thoughts in specific situations, and then to generate alternate perspectives.

Therapist Guidance

Clients should be instructed to record specific instances in which angry thoughts, feelings, or responses were prompted.

  1. In the first column (Situation) clients should be instructed to record what they were doing when they started to notice a significant change in how they were feeling. Training clients to record specific details (such as who they were with, where they were, and what had just happened) is often helpful when later elaborating a memory for an event, or simply in understanding the reasons for subsequent thoughts and responses
  2. In the second column (Angry thoughts) clients should be directed to record any automatic cognitions. They should be reminded that cognitions can take the form of verbal thoughts, but can also take the form of images, or memories. If a recorded cognition is an image (e.g. “I had a picture in my mind of him smiling as he pushed in”), clients should be directed to question what that image means to them (e.g “It means he knows that he’s taking advantage, that he thinks I’m weak”) and to record that idiosyncratic meaning.
  3. In the third column (Emotions and body sensations) clients should be instructed to record their emotional reactions in that moment (which can typically be described using single words, e.g. angry, annoyed, frustrated) and associated body sensations (e.g. tightness in my stomach). Clients should be encouraged to rate the intensity of these sensations on 0–100% scale.
  4. In the fourth column (Balanced response) clients should be instructed to generate alternate ways of interpreting the situation. Reframing angry thoughts will likely need to be practiced in-session. Suggestions might include making efforts to depersonalize a situation (“he wasn’t try to get at me personally, he’s just being rude to everyone”) or to take alternate perspectives (“is this insult going to matter to me in 6 months time?”).

References And Further Reading

  • Beck, A.T., Rush, A.J., Shaw, B.F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.
  • Fernandez, E., & Beck, R. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral self-intervention versus self-monitoring of anger: Effects on anger frequency, duration, and intensity. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(3), 345-356.