Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy is a cognitive-experiential-behavioral system of psychotherapy. Developed in 1955 as the first of the cognitive behavioral therapies, it has roots in Stoic philosophers such as Epicurus, Epictetus, and Marcus Aurelius. It is underpinned by the idea that “people do not merely get upset by adverse life conditions, but instead often choose to disturb themselves about these adversities” (Ellis, 2002). Ellis’ theory of REBT holds that people try to remain alive and achieve basic goals (G). Along the way they encounter adversities (A). They follow rational or irrational beliefs (B) which construct consequences (C) such as feelings or actions that either move them toward or away from their goals. Fundamentally, although adversities contribute to consequences they are mediated by beliefs. REBT holds that people have to consciously, forcefully, and actively dispute (D) the irrational beliefs that are causing their disturbances—this disputation can be cognitive, emotional, and behavioral. Read more
Assumptions of REBT
- Most people consciously and unconsciously train themselves to be to some degree emotionally disturbed.
- People’s self-defeating cognitions, emotions, and behaviors are intrinsically and holistically connected.
- If they choose to do so, and work hard at modifying their thinking, feeling, and behaving, they can teach themselves to lead more satisfying lives.
- Many irrational beliefs with which people disturb themselves can be categorized under three major headings which include absolutistic shoulds, oughts, and musts. These imperatives, from which other beliefs can be derived, are:
- ‘I absolutely must perform well at important tasks and be approved by significant others—or else I am an inadequate person!’
- ‘Other people must absolutely treat me kindly, considerately, and fairly—or else they are bad individuals!’
- ‘Conditions under which I live absolutely must provide me with what I really want—or else my life is horrible, I can’t stand it, and the world’s a rotten place!’
Ellis, A. (2002). Rational emotive behavior therapy. In M. Hersen & W. H. Sledge (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Psychotherapy, Volume 2 (pp. 483–487). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press.
The Dysfunctional Thought Record is a Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) tool to record and challenge dysfunctional thoughts. ... https://www.psychologytools.com/resource/dysfunctional-thought-record/
The REBT Consequences Analysis Form is a form of ‘functional/pragmatic disputing’ and can be used to challenge and restructure irrational ... https://www.psychologytools.com/resource/rebt-consequences-analysis-form/
In Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) emotional problems are dealt with before any others. The REBT Problem Formulation is designed to help cli ... https://www.psychologytools.com/resource/rebt-problem-formulation/
- Emotional disturbance in a nutshell download archived copy
- A brief introduction to Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy – Wayne Froggatt download archived copy
- Structured disputing of irrational beliefs – Windy Dryden download archived copy
- What is Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)? Outlining the approach by considering the four elements of its name – Windy Dryden download archived copy
- REBT Network download
- REBT depression manual download archived copy
- First steps in using REBT in life coaching – Windy Dryden download archived copy
- Albert Ellis and Gloria – full counselling session youtube
- 21 ways to stop worrying – Albert Ellis youtube
- Substituting rational thinking for irrational thoughts – Albert Ellis youtube
- David, D. (2014). The Empirical Status of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) Theory & Practice. Therapy, 3, 175-221 download archived copy
- Dryden, W. (2013). On rational beliefs in rational emotive behavior therapy: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 31(1), 39-48 download archived copy
- Ellis, A. (1980). Rational-emotive therapy and cognitive behavior therapy: Similarities and differences. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4(4), 325-340 download archived copy