All-Or-Nothing Thinking

The All-Or-Nothing Thinking information handout forms part of the cognitive distortions series, designed to help clients and therapists to work more effectively with common thinking biases.

Download or send

Professional version

Offers theory, guidance, and prompts for mental health professionals. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Client version

Includes client-friendly guidance. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Overview

All-or-nothing thinking (often also referred to as ‘black and white thinking’, ‘dichotomous thinking’, ‘absolutist thinking’, or ‘binary thinking’) is a common form of cognitive distortion or ‘unhelpful thinking style’. People who think in all-or-nothing terms may also act in equivalently extreme ways. They may veer, for example, between complete abstinence and ‘binges’, or between extreme effort and none. The All-Or-Nothing Thinking information handout forms part of the cognitive distortions series, designed to help clients and therapists to work more effectively with common thinking biases.

Why Use This Resource?

All-or-nothing thinking is associated with various psychological disorders. This resource helps clients:

  • Become more aware of cognitive distortions.
  • Recognize extreme, all-or-nothing thought patterns.
  • Implement strategies that support and encourage more balanced thinking.

Key Benefits

Informative

Explains what all-or-nothing thinking is.

Awareness-raising

Helps clients to notice dichotomous thoughts.

Practical

Describes strategies for overcoming all-or-nothing thinking.

Versatile

Suitable for a wide range of clients.

Who is this for?

Perfectionism

Characterized by extreme standards.

Borderline Personality Disorder

Associated with emotional instability and dichotomous thinking.

Eating Disorders

Characterized by all-or-nothing thoughts related to shape, weight, and eating.

Burnout

Sometimes accompanied by extreme attitudes towards work and performance.

Integrating it into your practice

01

Identify

Recognize the presence of all-or-nothing thoughts during sessions.

02

Discuss

Explore whether clients relate to the information provided in the handout.

03

Intervene

Encourage clients to use the strategies outlined to address their all-or-nothing thoughts.

04

Review

Assess any positive changes in clients' thinking, behavior, or emotional responses.

Theoretical Background & Therapist Guidance

Cognitive distortions, cognitive biases, or ‘unhelpful thinking styles’ are characteristic ways in which our thoughts can become biased (Beck, 1963). Different cognitive biases are associated with different clinical presentations. For example, catastrophizing is associated with anxiety disorders (e.g. Nöel et al, 2012), dichotomous thinking has been linked to emotional instability (Veen & Arntz, 2000), and thought-action fusion is associated with obsessive compulsive disorder (Shafran et al, 1996).

All-or-nothing thinking (often also referred to as ‘black and white thinking’, ‘dichotomous thinking’, ‘absolutist thinking’, or ‘binary thinking’) is a common form of cognitive distortion or ‘unhelpful thinking style’. People who think in all-or-nothing terms may also act in equivalently extreme ways. They may veer, for example, between complete abstinence and ‘binges’, or between extreme effort and none. Unfortunately, all-or-nothing thinking rarely matches reality and can set individuals up to feel confused or disappointed.

There are evolutionary reasons why people might think in binary ways (Gilbert, 1998). In the face of an uncertain situation, forming simplified binary representations (e.g. it is ‘good’ or ‘bad’?) is thought to confer a speed-of-processing advantage which facilitates fight or flight responses (Bonfá-Araujo et al, 2021). Similarly, categorising in a binary fashion makes the world simpler to understand (at the cost of accuracy): complex problems become solvable and the world may feel more predictable.

What's inside

  • Comprehensive introduction to cognitive distortions and all-or-nothing thinking.
  • Therapist guidance for using the resource with clients.
  • Key references and recommended further reading.
Get access to this resource

FAQs

All-or-nothing thinking is a cognitive distortion where individuals perceive or judge situations in binary terms.
Introduce strategies like thought records, continuum work, dialectical thinking, and behavioral experiments.

How This Resource Improves Clinical Outcomes

Utilizing this handout helps clients:

  • Identify cognitive distortions that contribute to their distress.
  • Break the cycle of extreme thinking and behavior.
  • Use effective strategies that support more balanced thinking.

References And Further Reading

  • Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression: I. Idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9(4), 324-333.
  • Beck, A. T. (1964). Thinking and depression: II. Theory and therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 10(6), 561-571.
  • Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Beck, A. T., Freeman, A., Davis, D. D., & Associates. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Bonfá‐Araujo, B., Oshio, A., & Hauck‐Filho, N. (2021). Seeing Things in Black‐and‐White: A Scoping Review on Dichotomous Thinking Style. Japanese Psychological Research.
  • Egan, S. J., Piek, J. P., Dyck, M. J., & Rees, C. S. (2007). The role of dichotomous thinking and rigidity in perfectionism. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(8), 1813-1822.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
  • Gilbert, P. (1998). The evolved basis and adaptive functions of cognitive distortions. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71(4), 447-463.
  • Lethbridge, J., Watson, H. J., Egan, S. J., Street, H., & Nathan, P. R. (2011). The role of perfectionism, dichotomous thinking, shape and weight overvaluation, and conditional goal setting in eating disorders. Eating behaviors, 12(3), 200-206.
  • Ledingham, M. D., Standen, P., Skinner, C., & Busch, R. (2019). I should have known”. The perceptual barriers faced by mental health practitioners in recognising and responding to their own burnout symptoms. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 10(2), 125-145.
  • Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT Skills Training Manual. London: The Guilford Press.
  • Napolitano, L. A., & McKay, D. (2007). Dichotomous thinking in borderline personality disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(6), 717-726.
  • Neuringer, C. (1961). Dichotomous evaluations in suicidal individuals. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 445- 449.
  • Noël, V. A., Francis, S. E., Williams-Outerbridge, K., & Fung, S. L. (2012). Catastrophizing as a predictor of depressive and anxious symptoms in children. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(4), 311-320.
  • Ohsiek, S., & Williams, M. (2011). Psychological factors influencing weight loss maintenance: An integrative literature review. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 23, 592-601.
  • Palascha, A., Van Kleef, E., & van Trijp, H. C. (2015). How does thinking in Black and White terms relate to eating behavior and weight regain? Journal of Health Psychology, 20(5), 638-648.
  • Shafran, R., Thordarson, D. S., & Rachman, S. (1996). Thought-action fusion in obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10(5), 379-391.
  • Stott, R., Mansell, W., Salkovskis, P., Lavender, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2010). Oxford guide to metaphors in CBT: Building cognitive bridges. OUP Oxford.
  • Teasdale, J. D. (1996). Clinically relevant theory: Integrating clinical insight with cognitive science. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 26-47). The Guilford Press.
  • Teasdale, J. D., Scott, J., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., & Paykel, E. S. (2001). How does cognitive therapy prevent relapse in residual depression? Evidence from a controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 347-357.
  • Veen, G., & Arntz, A. (2000). Multidimensional dichotomous thinking characterizes borderline personality disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(1), 23-45.