CBT Model - Past And Present

Formulation is a key component of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and essential to effective practice. This CBT Model – Past And Present is a descriptive formulation that introduces clients to the cognitive behavioral model, highlighting the interplay between thoughts, feelings, and behavior. It also explains how past life experiences, underlying core beliefs, and dysfunctional assumptions shape cognitive appraisals and contribute to current difficulties.

Download or send

Language

Professional version

Offers theory, guidance, and prompts for mental health professionals. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Client version

Includes client-friendly guidance. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Editable version (PPT)

An editable Microsoft PowerPoint version of the resource.

Overview

The CBT Model - Past And Present worksheet provides a descriptive formulation that can be used with a range of clients. It highlights how past experiences and core beliefs influence current cognitive appraisals and difficulties more generally. Incorporating core beliefs and dysfunctional assumptions - and the life experiences that have led to their formation - can benefit descriptive formulations in several ways. This information can help clients to make links between the past and the present; contextualize their symptoms and understand their origins; understand why symptoms persist across time and situations; tell a broader story of their lives. Therapists should note that exploring early life experiences is often unnecessary during the early stages of therapy. Kuyken and colleagues (2009) advise exploring negative core beliefs and associated developmental experiences only when it is necessary, after constructing other conceptualizations, and when a strong therapeutic alliance has been developed.

Why Use This Resource?

Formulation is integral to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), helping develop a comprehensive understanding of client difficulties and guiding effective intervention strategies.

Enhances understanding of client difficulties in the here-and-now.
Provides insight into the the origins of these difficulties.
Supports client engagement, alliance formation, and treatment planning.

Key Benefits

Understanding

Helps clients understand the cognitive behavioral model.

Perspective

Provides insight into the nature of these difficulties and their origins.

Alliance

Strengthens the therapeutic relationship through collaborative exploration.

Who is this for?

Depression

Provides insight into how core beliefs shape negative automatic thoughts.

Anxiety

Explores the relationship between anxious thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and underlying beliefs.

Trauma

Connects past traumatic events to current difficulties.

Self-Esteem Issues

Identifies core beliefs and assumptions impact thoughts related to self-worth.

Integrating it into your practice

Identify

Explore key historical events to identify core beliefs and assumptions.

Connect

Link these underlying beliefs to current thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.

Educate

Explain how thoughts, feelings, and behaviors reinforce each other.

Reflect

Help the client reflect on the formulation, including its implications for therapy.

Theoretical Background & Therapist Guidance

Formulation in CBT is a dynamic, collaborative process that integrates theory, research, and client experiences. It aids in understanding problem areas, designing interventions, and adapting treatments to individual needs. Key aspects include:

Combining therapist and client perspectives to develop meaningful formulations.
Using psychological theories and empirical data alongside client experiences to inform case conceptualizations.
Formulations are reviewed and revised throughout therapy.

This resource integrates past experiences to contextualize clients' difficulties and introduce key concepts in CBT, such as automatic thoughts and underlying beliefs.

What's inside

Comprehensive overview of case conceptualization in CBT.
Guidance for constructing cognitive behavioral formulations.
Therapist prompts to help create a meaningful formulation.
A structured framework for linking past experiences with present difficulties.

Get access to this resource

FAQs

Yes, it's designed to introduce clients to CBT concepts and can be used in the early stages of treatment.

Explore past experiences only when it seems useful or necessary, ensuring the client paces these conversations and a strong therapeutic alliance has been established.

Looking for recurring themes in automatic thoughts, suggest possible beliefs, or use appropriate questionnaires.

How This Resource Improves Clinical Outcomes

Utilizing the CBT Model – Past And Present worksheet improves clinical outcomes by:

Providing an easy-to-use framework for case conceptualization.
Introducing clients to the cognitive behavioral model.
Informing personalized and effective interventions.
Supporting the development of a therapeutic alliance.

Therapists benefit from a versatile tool that can be used with a range of clients and current difficulties.

Clinicians Who Use This Resource Also Use

References And Further Reading

Arntz, A. (2018). Modifying core beliefs. In S. C. Hayes & S. G. Hoffman (Eds.), Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 339–350). Context Press.
Bakker, G. M. (2008). Problem‐maintaining circles: Case illustrations of formulations that truly guide therapy. Clinical Psychologist, 12 (1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13284200802069050
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press.
Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The Personality Belief Questionnaire. The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research.
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Burns, D. D. (1980). Feeling good: The new mood therapy. Penguin Books.
Butler, G. (1998). Clinical formulation. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive Clinical Psychology (pp. 1–23). Oxford.
Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24 (4), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(86)90011-2
Division of Clinical Psychology [DCP]. (2010). The core purpose and philosophy of the profession. The British Psychological Society.
Dudley, R., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Case formulation in cognitive behavioural therapy: A principle-driven approach. In L. Johnstone & R. Dallos (Eds.), Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed., pp. 18–44). Routledge.
Fennell, M. (2016). Overcoming self-esteem self-help course. Part three: Changing the rules, creating a new bottom line, and looking to the future. Robinson.
Hayes, S. C., & Follette, W. C. (1992). Can functional analysis provide a substitute for syndromal classification? Behavioral Assessment, 14, 345–365.Hsu, L. G., & Holder, D. (1986). Bulimia nervosa: Treatment and short-term outcome. Psychological Medicine, 16 (1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700002543
James, I. A., Southam, L., & Blackburn, I. M. (2004). Schemas revisited. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11, 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.423
Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (2014). Introduction to formulation. In L. Johnstone & R. Dallos (Eds.), Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed., pp. 1–17). Routledge.
Kennerley, H., Kirk, J., & Westbrook, D. (2017). An introduction to cognitive behaviour therapy (3rd ed.). Sage.
Kuyken, W. (2006). Evidence-based case formulation: Is the emperor clothed? In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 12–35). Routledge.
Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2009). Collaborative case conceptualisation: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Guilford Press.
Maher, A., Cason, L., Huckstepp, T., Stallman, H., Kannis‐Dymand, L., Millear, P., ... & Allen, A. (2022). Early maladaptive schemas in eating disorders: A systematic review. European Eating Disorders Review, 30 (1), 3–22.
Moorey, S. (2010). The six cycles maintenance model: Growing a “vicious flower” for depression. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38 (2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809990580
Muse, K., McManus, F., Rakovshik, S., & Thwaites, R. (2017). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Assessment of Core CBT Skills (ACCS): An observation-based tool for assessing cognitive behavioral therapy competence. Psychological Assessment, 29, 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000372
Padesky, C. A. (2020). Collaborative case conceptualization: Client knows best. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 27, 392–404.
Padesky, C. A., & Greenberger, D. (2020). The clinician’s guide to CBT using Mind Over Mood (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Padesky, C. A., & Mooney, K. A. (1990). Presenting the cognitive model to clients. International Cognitive Therapy Newsletter, 6, 13–14.
Persons, J. B. (1989). Cognitive therapy in practice: A case formulation approach. W. W. Norton and Company.
Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. Guilford Press.
Persons, J. B., & Hong, J. J. (2016). Case formulation and the outcome of cognitive behavior therapy. In N. Tarrier & J. Johnson (Eds.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases (2nd ed., pp. 14–37). Routledge.
Riso, L. P., & McBride, C. (2007). Introduction: A return to a focus on cognitive schemas. In L. P. Riso, P. L. du Toit, D. J. Stein, & J. E. Young (Eds.), Cognitive schemas and core beliefs in psychological problems: A scientist-practitioner guide (pp. 3–9). American Psychological Association.
Royal College of Psychiatrists [RCP]. (2017). Using formulation in general psychiatric care: Good practice. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Salkovskis, P. M., Clark, D. M., & Gelder, M. G. (1996). Cognition-behaviour links in the persistence of panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34 (5–6), 453–458.
- Salkovskis, P. M., Warwick, H. M., & Deale, A. C. (2003). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for severe and persistent health anxiety (hypochondriasis). Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 3 (3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhg026
Spencer, H. M., Dudley, R., Johnston, L., Freeston, M. H., Turkington, D., & Tully, S. (2023). Case formulation—A vehicle for change? Exploring the impact of cognitive behavioural therapy formulation in first episode psychosis: A reflexive thematic analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 96 (3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12442
Sperry, L., & Sperry, J. (2012). Case conceptualization: Mastering this competency with ease and confidence. Routledge.
Weissman, A. N., & Beck, A. T. (1978, August). Development and validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A preliminary investigation. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.