Skip to main content

CBT Model – Past And Present

Formulation is a key component of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and essential to effective practice. This CBT Model – Past And Present is a descriptive formulation that introduces clients to the cognitive behavioral model, highlighting the interplay between thoughts, feelings, and behavior. It also explains how past life experiences, underlying core beliefs, and dysfunctional assumptions shape cognitive appraisals and contribute to current difficulties. Incorporating core beliefs and dysfunctional assumptions – and the life experiences that have led to their formation – can benefit descriptive formulations in several ways. This information can help clients to make links between the past and the present; contextualize their symptoms and understand their origins; understand why symptoms persist across time and situations; tell a broader story of their lives. Therapists should note that exploring early life experiences is often unnecessary during the early stages of therapy. Kuyken and colleagues (2009) advise exploring negative core beliefs and associated developmental experiences only when it is necessary, after constructing other conceptualizations, and when a strong therapeutic alliance has been developed.

Download or send

Choose your language

Notice: The 'Fillable PDF' format has been retired. For resources with form elements, both the 'Professional' and 'Client' versions are now available as fillable PDFs by default.

Professional version

Offers theory, guidance, and prompts for mental health professionals. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Client version

Includes client-friendly guidance. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Editable version (PPT)

An editable Microsoft PowerPoint version of the resource.

Translation Template

Are you a qualified therapist who would like to help with our translation project?

Tags

Languages this resource is available in

  • English (GB)
  • English (US)

Techniques associated with this resource

Mechanisms associated with this resource

Introduction & Theoretical Background

Formulation in talking therapies

Formulations (also known as case formulations, case conceptualizations, and working hypotheses) are a central component of most talking therapies and a key skill for mental health professionals (DCP, 2010; RCP, 2017; Sperry & Sperry, 2012). In essence, a formulation is a way to make sense of an individual’s difficulties. It is a provisional account or hypothesis, informed by psychological theory, about what an individual is struggling with and why (Johnstone & Dallos, 2014). A formulation is also a tool that therapists use to relate theory to practice (Butler, 1998). Sperry and Sperry (2012, p. 4) describe formulations as:

A method and clinical strategy for obtaining and organizing information about a client, understanding and explaining the client’s situation and maladaptive patterns, guiding and focusing treatment, anticipating challenges and roadblocks, and preparing for successful termination.

Formulation is a fundamental part of most (if not all) therapeutic

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access

Therapist Guidance

"I’d like to explore how the issues we’ve talked about fit together. One way we can do that is by drawing a diagram. Would that be OK?"

Step 1 – Explore the client’s experience

Event

Ask the client to identify and describe a specific recent event that triggered their difficulty. Note that trigger events can be external (e.g., a difficult interaction) or internal (e.g., an unusual physical sensation). Some individuals find it helpful to close their eyes and visualize the event (Beck, 2011). Consider asking: 

"Let’s start by writing down a situation that recently triggered your difficulty. Can you think of an example? What happened?"

Next, explore the client’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to the trigger event. Therapists are encouraged to add this information to the formulation in whatever order the client shares it (Kuyken et al., 2009).

Thoughts

Examine the client’s cognitive response to the trigger (i.e., their

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access

References And Further Reading

  • Arntz, A. (2018). Modifying core beliefs. In: S. C. Hayes & S. G. Hoffman (Eds.), Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy (pp.339-350). Context Press.
  • Bakker, G. M. (2008). Problem‐maintaining circles: Case illustrations of formulations that truly guide therapy. Clinical Psychologist, 12, 30-39. DOI: 10.1080/13284200802069050.
  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.
  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press.
  • Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The Personality Belief Questionnaire. Bala Cynwyd, PA: The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research.
  • Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford.
  • Burns, D. D. (1980). Feeling good: The new mood therapy. Penguin Books.
  • Butler, G. (1998). Clinical formulation. In: A. S. Bellack and M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive Clinical Psychology (pp.1-23). Oxford.
  • Butler,

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access