Skip to main content

Theory A / Theory B

Human beings actively try to understand their world and what happens to them. However, these understanding can be inaccurate or unhelpful. Worse, unhelpful beliefs often drive unhelpful behaviors that can serve to inadvertently reinforce the original belief. Therapists can find it challenging working with client appraisals of a problem. One powerful way of working with problematic client appraisals is to frame their belief as a ‘theory’ or ‘hypothesis’ about how the world works. Theory A / Theory B, sometimes referred to as the “dual model strategy” is a powerful and flexible technique for introducing alternative accounts of a problem: it is a collaborative framework for formulating client problems; a method for assessing a client’s conviction in their ‘theory A’; a framework for generating alternative or more helpful ways of interpreting a problem (a cognitive restructuring tool); a way to guide or scaffold the process of data gathering (“how could we find out which theory is the best way of explaining the data?”) which can lead to behavioral experiments.

Download or send

Choose your language

Notice: The 'Fillable PDF' format has been retired. For resources with form elements, both the 'Professional' and 'Client' versions are now available as fillable PDFs by default.

Professional version

Offers theory, guidance, and prompts for mental health professionals. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Client version

Includes client-friendly guidance. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Editable version (PPT)

An editable Microsoft PowerPoint version of the resource.

Translation Template

Are you a qualified therapist who would like to help with our translation project?

Tags

Languages this resource is available in

  • Arabic
  • Bulgarian
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • English (GB)
  • English (US)
  • German
  • Hindi
  • Italian
  • Polish
  • Spanish (International)
  • Vietnamese

Problems this resource might be used to address

Techniques associated with this resource

Introduction & Theoretical Background

“The most effective way of changing a misinterpretation … is to help the person come up with an alternative, less threatening interpretation of his or her experience.” (Salkovskis, 1996)

Human beings actively try to understand their world and what happens to them. The clients we see in therapy are no exception. Clients who are struggling with difficulties often hold on to beliefs which help them to explain what is happening. For example:

One problem is that the beliefs

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access

Therapist Guidance

This technique can be used when clients hold threatening beliefs about their experiences (theory A) – for example, that these experiences are dangerous to themselves, or to those around them. A helpful approach is to introduce the possibility of there being an alternative or competing hypothesis (Theory B).

Helpful analogies include those of a scientist or police detective.

  • Scientist: When science works well, a scientist will start with some data – some facts or observations – and then they will try to develop a theory to explain the facts. Sometimes the theory will be wrong, but that’s OK because finding out that it’s wrong means that the scientist can come up with a better – more accurate – theory. As an example, an ancient belief was that tooth decay was caused by a ‘tooth worm’. In the 17th century a French physician came up with a new theory that

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access

References And Further Reading

  • Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy for anxiety disorders. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Salkovskis, P. M. (1997). Frontiers of cognitive therapy. Guilford.
  • Salkovskis, P. M., Bass, C. (1997). Hypochondriasis. In The Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (eds Clark & Fairburn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access