Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET)
- Robjant, K., Fazel, M. (2010). The emerging evidence for Narrative Exposure Therapy: a review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(8), 1030-1039 link
- Neuner, F., Schauer, M., & Elbert, T. (2014). On the efficacy of Narrative Exposure Therapy: a reply to Mundt et al. Intervention, 12(2), 267-278. download archived copy
- Neuner, F., Schauer, M., Klaschik, C., et al. (2004). A comparison of Narrative Exposure Therapy, Supportive Counselling, and Psychoeducation for Treating Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in an african Refugee Settlement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(4), 579-587 download archived copy
- Elbert, T., Schauer, M. (2002). Burnt into memory. Nature, 419, 883. download archived copy
- Definition of NET at CommonLanguagePsychotherapy.org download archived copy
What Is Narrative Exposure Therapy?
Theoretical Basis of NET
NET is grounded in emotional processing theory (Foa & Kozak, 1986), which proposes that hypothetical ‘fear structures’ in memory are represented in a network containing “(a) information about the feared stimulus situation, (b) information about verbal, physiological, and overt behavioral responses; and (c) interpretive information about the meaning of the stimulus and response elements of the structure”. Foa and Kozak proposed that treating fear and anxiety is achieved through modifying elements of this fear network by activating the memory and introducing new, incompatible, information. For example a trauma survivor might be asked to remember the moment of their trauma when they believed ‘I’m going to die’ and would be asked ‘What do you know now?,’ thus introducing the incompatible information ‘I survived.’ NET recognizes that PTSD is best understood as a disorder of memory with more recent findings relevant to autobiographical memory (Elbert, Schauer, & Neuner, 2015) indicating that traumatic experiences can sometimes lead to a dissociation between contextual representations of an event (C-REPS) and sensory representations (S-REPS: Brewin, Gregory, Lipton, & Burgess, 2010).
In technical terms the psychotherapeutic approach taken by NET includes elements of:
- prolonged exposure and repeated imaginative reliving of the traumatic situation in order to activate and modify the corresponding fear structure;
- active reconstruction of the autobiographic memories of the trauma through the process of completing a comprehensive, meaningful, and consistent testimony of what happened;
- cognitive re-evaluation and reinterpretation of the trauma narrative in order to correct false thoughts and negative beliefs generated by the trauma which affected the healthy processing of memory.
Practical Steps of NET
The process of NET is described in the treatment manual (Schauer, Neuner, & Elbert, 2011) and in a review chapter (Elbert, Schauer, & Neuner, 2015). NET begins with an assessment of the patient’s mental health needs and psychoeducational information is given concerning trauma, memory, symptoms, universal human rights, and treatment rationale.
NET starts with a biographical overview of the life span which is symbolized in a ritual called the lifeline. In this exercise positive and negative life events are symbolized by stones and flowers, which are placed along a line. The patient places important events along a line while briefly classifying them in a factual way. Concluded in one session, the lifeline provides an overview (‘map’) of the subsequent work.
In subsequent NET sessions the patient is helped to construct a chronological narrative of his/her life story with a particular focus on traumatic experiences. The patient is asked to recount their life story in chronological order and whenever a ‘stone’ (traumatic event) is encountered it is relived and narrated in a moment by moment manner—with exploration of sensory information, cognitions, affective and bodily reactions—without losing connect to the ‘here and now.’ The therapist can record the results as a testimony that can be used for documentary purposes. In each subsequent session the autobiography is briefly repeated, details corrected, and further events are processed. This process is repeated until the patient’s life span has been covered. In the final session the lifeline may be re-reviewed, the testimony read aloud and signed by the patient/therapist/translator. In some cases patients may agree for copies to be passed to lawyers or human rights organizations to document the events that occurred.
- Brewin, C. R., Gregory, J. D., Lipton, M., & Burgess, N. (2010). Intrusive images in psychological disorders: Characteristics, neural mechanisms, and treatment implications. Psychological Review, 117(1), 210–232.
- Elbert, T., Schauer, M., & Neuner, F. (2015). Narrative exposure therapy (NET): Reorganizing memories of traumatic stress, fear, and violence. In U. Schnyder & M. Cloitre (Eds.), Evidence based treatments for trauma-related psychological disorders(pp. 229–253). Cham: Springer.
- Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychological bulletin, 99(1), 20.
- Schauer, M., Neuner, F., & Elbert, T. (2011). Narrative exposure therapy: A short-term treatment for traumatic stress disorders(2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.