Alternative Action Formulation

The Alternative Action Formulation is a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) worksheet designed to help clients and therapists collaboratively understand problems and focus on more adaptive behavioral strategies.

Download or send

Professional version

Offers theory, guidance, and prompts for mental health professionals. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Client version

Includes client-friendly guidance. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Fillable version (PDF)

A fillable version of the resource. This can be edited and saved in Adobe Acrobat, or other PDF editing software.

Editable version (PPT)

An editable Microsoft PowerPoint version of the resource.

Overview

This formulation template utilizes a problem > coping strategy > unintended consequence format that encourages clients and therapists to explore current difficulties and develop alternative coping mechanisms. It is a valuable resource for facilitating cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) case conceptualizations by offering a clear and concise method for identifying and modifying maladaptive behavior patterns.

Why Use This Resource?

The Alternative Action Formulation promotes a collaborative therapeutic approach, integrating CBT principles to enhance understanding and problem-solving strategies.

  • Facilitates a shared understanding of issues between client and therapist.
  • Encourages exploration of short-term gains and long-term costs of current strategies.
  • Promotes client engagement by focusing on their current difficulties and effective coping alternatives.

Key Benefits

Structure

Provides a clear framework for case formulation and behavior assessment.

Collaboration

Enhances the therapeutic alliance through joint problem exploration.

Insight

Offers insights into cognitive mechanisms like avoidance and rumination.

Alternatives

Guides clients in identifying adaptive strategies for long-term change.

Who is this for?

Depression

Clients who feel stuck in cycles of withdrawal, rumination, or self-criticism, and who use coping strategies like avoidance or inactivity that offer short-term relief but maintain low mood in the long term.

Anxiety

Individuals who engage in safety behaviors (e.g., avoidance, reassurance seeking, checking) that reduce distress temporarily but reinforce underlying fears and perpetuate anxiety.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Clients who use dissociation, avoidance, or substance use to manage trauma-related distress, but find that these coping mechanisms prevent emotional processing and maintain symptoms.

Stress

Those who respond to life stressors with habitual coping strategies that are ineffective or self-defeating, such as overworking, emotional suppression, or irritability.

Integrating it into your practice

01

Identify

Begin with identifying the client's current issues and coping strategies.

02

Explore

Explore the consequences of these strategies, noting both short-term gains and long-term drawbacks.

03

Encourage

Encourage the client to consider alternative strategies that are more adaptive.

04

Discuss

Discuss potential solutions and focus on incremental, practical changes.

05

Record

Document insights and progress in the worksheet for ongoing reference and adjustment.

Theoretical Background & Therapist Guidance

The Alternative Action Formulation is rooted in core principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), particularly the understanding that psychological problems are maintained by learned patterns of thinking and behavior that may have short-term benefits but long-term costs (Beck, 1976; Persons, 2012). This worksheet supports the process of case formulation by guiding clients and therapists through a structured examination of maladaptive coping strategies and their unintended consequences.

Many clients present to therapy using automatic coping strategies — such as avoidance, withdrawal, reassurance-seeking, or rumination — that are initially effective in reducing emotional discomfort but which ultimately reinforce distress or interfere with valued goals. These patterns are well-documented in the CBT literature across multiple disorders (Clark & Beck, 2010; Salkovskis, 1996). For example, avoidance in anxiety may prevent fear extinction, while rumination in depression maintains negative mood and disrupts problem-solving.

The problem > coping strategy > unintended consequence format mirrors widely used CBT formulation models that emphasize functional analysis: understanding what maintains a problem and what reinforces ineffective responses (Kuyken, Padesky, & Dudley, 2009). This type of structured formulation helps make maintenance cycles explicit and fosters insight into the links between thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and outcomes.

Additionally, the worksheet encourages clients to identify and experiment with alternative actions — new behavioral strategies that may feel unfamiliar or effortful but offer potential for more adaptive and sustainable outcomes. This reflects the CBT emphasis on behavioral activation, exposure, and skills development as vehicles for change (Jacobson et al., 2001; Barlow et al., 2011).

The resource also accommodates a biopsychosocial perspective, recognizing that current coping strategies may be influenced by biological predispositions (e.g., heightened threat sensitivity), developmental history (e.g., learned family patterns), and current contextual factors (e.g., lack of social support). Mapping these layers in a collaborative, visual way can reduce self-blame and foster therapeutic engagement.

Importantly, the Alternative Action Formulation supports the development of metacognitive awareness: helping clients to step back from habitual responses and reflect on why they do what they do, and what alternative responses might serve them better. In this sense, it aligns closely with the values of collaborative empiricism and guided discovery that underpin effective CBT practice (Padesky, 1996).

What's inside

  • A comprehensive worksheet for CBT case conceptualization.
  • Sections dedicated to problem identification, coping strategies, and alternative actions.
  • Step-by-step guidance on exploring both cognitive mechanisms and biopsychosocial factors.
Get access to this resource

FAQs

This is a CBT-based tool used to understand and modify a client's problems by identifying coping strategies and their consequences, promoting more adaptive behaviors.
It provides a structured approach to collaboratively explore client problems, focusing on developing feasible and effective alternative strategies for long-term change.
Work on building trust and encouraging small, incremental changes. Use empathetic questioning to engage clients in considering alternative actions while respecting their pace.
Guide clients to consider hypothetical situations or role reversal ("What would you advise a friend?") to stimulate new ideas and alternative behaviors.

How This Resource Improves Clinical Outcomes

By applying the Alternative Action Formulation in therapy, clinicians can:

  • Increase client awareness of cognitive biases and maladaptive strategies.
  • Encourage the development of healthier, more adaptive behaviors.
  • Enhance the understanding of the interplay between thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.
  • Facilitate a more robust therapeutic alliance through collaborative formulation processes.

Therapists benefit from:

  • A structured tool for exploring therapeutic issues.
  • A collaborative approach to discussing client problems.
  • Greater flexibility and adaptability to individual client needs.

References And Further Reading

  • Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2011). Toward a unified protocol for emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 42(3), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.002
  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.
  • Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: Science and practice. Guilford Press.
  • Eells, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation. Guilford Press.
  • Jacobson, N. S., Martell, C. R., & Dimidjian, S. (2001). Behavioral activation treatment for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(3), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.8.3.255
  • Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (2013). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems. Routledge.
  • Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2009). Collaborative case conceptualization: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Guilford Press.
  • Padesky, C. A. (1996). Developing cognitive therapy skills: A schema-focused approach. European Psychologist, 1(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.1.52
  • Persons, J. B. (2012). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. Guilford Press.
  • Salkovskis, P. M. (1996). The cognitive approach to anxiety: Threat beliefs, safety-seeking behavior, and the special case of health anxiety. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 48-74). Guilford Press.
  • Tarrier, N., & Johnson, J. (Eds.). (2015). Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases. Routledge.